Checkmate Services P. Ltd. v Commissioner of Income Tax-I

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The case involves the interpretation of Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning whether the appellant assessees are entitled to a deduction of amounts deposited towards contributions in terms of various provident and superannuation funds. The Assessing Officers ruled that the appellants had belatedly deposited their employees' contributions towards the EPF and ESI, and thus, the sums received constituted 'income' and could not be allowed as deductions. The assessees' pleas were unsuccessful before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the Gujarat High Court. The Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal due to a division of opinion among various High Courts.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the appellant assessees are entitled to a deduction of amounts deposited towards contributions in terms of various provident and superannuation funds under Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• The Mavliayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut & Anr.

  Supreme Court bench

• Sanjiv Prakashan vs. ACIT

  Jaipur bench

• Jyoti Weighing Systems Private Limited vs DCIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Dismissed

• The Bengal Chamber of Commerce And Industry

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2010-2011Allowed

• Taboola India P. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

• Tupperware India P. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.