Skip to main content

The Bengal Chamber of Commerce And Industry

Case No: ITA No. 758/KOL/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Date: 10/30/2025

Parties Involved

appellantThe Bengal Chamber of Commerce And Industry
respondentDeputy Director of Income Tax

Facts Summary

The appellant-assessee filed its return of income on 30.09.2010 declaring total income of Rs.31,783/-. The case was processed as per section 143(1) of the Act on 30.03.2012. This case was selected for scrutiny and notice under section 143(2) was issued on 15.09.2011 and served on 23.09.2011. Subsequently, notice under section 142(1) of the Act dated 13.09.2012 requiring the assessee to furnish certain particulars and details, was served by registered post. In the course of scrutiny proceeding, the assessee in its letter dated 14.01.2013 submitted that it had applied for registration under section 12A of the Act on 28.06.1973, but not received any communication thereafter. As it is confirmed that the assessee is not registered as an exempt entity and it is now assessed as a company and directed to file its return in the Company jurisdiction. After scrutiny, the ld. Assessing Officer added Rs.11,19,035/- towards contribution to provident fund and superannuation fund to the income of the assessee-company. Similarly, the ld. Assessing Officer added Rs.4,86,731/- towards Gratuity, repairs to building amounting to Rs.2,13,314/-, provident for doubtful debts amounting to Rs.6,62,200/- and donation for relief of Ayela amounting to Rs.8,88,002/- to the income of the assessee. The ld. Assessing Officer computed total income chargeable to tax at Rs.26,70,949/- and finally determined the tax payable at Rs.8,00,400/-.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the assessee is entitled for registration under section 12A of the Act for the assessment year 2010-11?
  • 2. Whether the grounds raised by the assessee regarding the addition of various amounts to the income are valid?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning