Sanjiv Prakashan vs. ACIT
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Sanjiv Prakashan, is engaged in the business of educational publication. For the assessment year 2020-21, the assessee filed a return of income admitting a total income of Rs. 5,41,03,200/-. The Assessing Officer assessed the income at Rs. 5,61,08,400/- after making a disallowance of Rs. 16,46,879/- under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act due to the late deposit of employees' contributions to Provident Fund (PF) and Employee State Insurance (ESI). The assessee claimed that the contributions were deposited in the government account before filing the return of income. The assessee appealed against the order of the National Faceless Assessment Center, which was dismissed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee then filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the order of the learned CPC under section 143(1) and the learned CIT(A) are bad in law and against the facts of the case.
- 2. Whether the learned AO has erred in disallowing a sum of Rs. 16,46,879/- under section 36(1)(va) read with section 2(24)(x) and the learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the said disallowance.
- 3. Whether the learned AO/CPC has erred in making adjustments under section 143(1) without giving intimation to the assessee of such adjustments, either in writing or in electronic mode, as per requirement of proviso to section 143(1), which makes the entire order of the learned AO/CPC bad in law and void ab initio.
- 4. Whether the learned AO/CPC has erred in making adjustments under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act for Employees Contribution for PF & ESI which are not covered by permissible adjustments under section 143(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, therefore, the adjustments so made are bad in law and should be deleted.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
5 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
O.K. Auto Components Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi Bench ‘E’ benchAY 2019-20AllowedJyoti Weighing Systems Private Limited vs DCIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19DismissedGurdev Singh vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3)
Delhi Bench benchAY 2020-21DismissedTrio Security And Intelligence Private Limited Vs. Assessing Officer
Delhi Bench benchAY 2021-22AllowedKachan Metals Pvt. Ltd. vs. DY. CIT, Circle -8(1)
Kolkata benchAY 2022-23AllowedPinnacle Vastunirman Private Limited vs. DCIT, Circle-4, Pune
Pune bench