Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 22 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
East Delhi Waste Processing Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT
The assessee, East Delhi Waste Processing Company Pvt. Ltd., is a subsidiary involved in waste processing and energy generation. The case pertains to the assessment year 2021-22. The assessee filed its return of income on 15.03.2022 declari…
Shayam Gupta vs. DCIT
The appeals are filed by the assessee against different orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi for the Assessment Years 2018-19 to 2021-22. The assessee challenged the initiation of proceedings under Section 15…
Lava International Ltd. vs Assessment Unit
The assessee company, Lava International Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of mobile phones under the brand name 'LAVA'. The company filed its return of income for INR 1,24,57,90,880/-. The case was selected for …
M/s A2Z Maintenance and Engg. Services Ltd. vs DCIT
The appeals pertain to the assessment years 2011-12 to 2013-14. The assessee, M/s A2Z Maintenance and Engg. Services Ltd., filed appeals against the orders passed by the ld. CIT(A)-3, Gurgaon, confirming certain additions made by the Assess…
M/s Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd. vs Asst. CIT, Central Circle-30
The assessee, M/s Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) confirming disallowance of Rs. 8,50,90,660/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and disallowance of Rs. 68,37,523/- claimed b…
M/s Singla Realters Ltd Vs. The I.T.O
The assessee, M/s Singla Realters Ltd, was engaged in the business of real estate and construction. The company claimed expenses towards purchase of construction material and travelling, which were partially disallowed by the Assessing Offi…
Sahara India Limited v. ACIT, Central Circle-I, Lucknow
The instant batch of ten cases involves the single assessee ‘Sahara India Ltd’. The cases revolve around various assessment years and involve issues such as deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e), disallowance of administrative and…
AT & T Global Network Services India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1)
The assessee, AT & T Global Network Services India Private Limited, filed an appeal against the order of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Faridabad, dated 23.03.2025, which arose out of an assessment order dated 17…
ITA No. 2309/KOL/2024 & CO No. 4/KOL/2025
The assessee, M/s Delightful Estate Developers LLP, filed a return of income on 21.07.2017 declaring total income at ₹ nil. A search action conducted on 25.05.2018 in the case of Banka Group of companies revealed that Mukesh Banka and assoc…
Sh. Vijay Pal Solanki vs. Income Tax Officer
This appeal arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15 [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi’s order dated 14.08.2019 passed in case no. 35/16-17, involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The learned Assessing …
Fluor Daniel India Private Limited vs. DCIT, Circle 7 (1)
During the assessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2020-21, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee, Fluor Daniel India Private Limited, had debited an amount of Rs.2,23,07,059/- on account of donation and corporate soc…
Cairs Computer Aided Information and Research Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO
The appellant, Cairs Computer Aided Information and Research Services Pvt. Ltd., filed returns of income for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued notices under Section 148 of the Income-Tax…
M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries Vs Income Tax Officer
The case involves two appeals by M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries against the orders of the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi and the PCIT, Rohtak for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessing authority had framed section 147 r.w.s. 144B assessment treating ce…
M/S JHS Sevendgaard Laboratories Ltd. Vs. DCIT
The Assessee, M/S JHS Sevendgaard Laboratories Ltd., was engaged in the business of manufacturing toothpaste and brushes for the year under consideration. The case of the Assessee was reopened, and an assessment order was passed on 31/03/20…
DCIT, CC-17, NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MANI CAPITAL LIMITED
The original return of income was filed by the assessee on 23.9.2015 declaring income of Rs. 3,21,843/-. A search and seizure operation u/s. 132 of the Act was carried out on 18.10.2019 in the case of M/s Alankit Limited, Shri Alok Kumar Ag…
West Bengal Co-Operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-50(1), Kolkata
The assessee, West Bengal Co-Operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd, e-filed its return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 declaring a total income of Rs. 77,63,28,710/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. Notices under …
Concord Fortune Minerals India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle 11(1)
The assessee, Concord Fortune Minerals India Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 29.11.2017, declaring a total income of ₹18,74,280/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and statutory notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the In…
Sahara India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd Vs ACIT, Circle-8(2), Kolkata
The assessee, incorporated on July 4, 2003, is engaged in the hospitality business. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2014-15, the assessee acquired a cruise ship for running a floating hotel in Goa. The ship was brou…
Gyan Prakash Gupta Vs. I.T.O., Ward-43(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Gyan Prakash Gupta, filed his return of income for AY 2018-19 showing a total income of ₹17,31,310/-. The Assessing Officer (Ld. AO) received information from DDIT (Inv), Unit-1(1), Kolkata, to examine the genuineness of the a…
ITA NO. 4232/Del/2024
The Revenue has filed an appeal against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, New Delhi dated 16.07.2024, relating to assessment year 2018-19. The ground raised in the Revenue’s appeal is that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition o…