Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 17 of 7 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Shri Yasir Arafat vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2)(4)

ITA Nos.- 7080/Del/2025 and five other appealsIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench25 Feb 2026AY 2019-20, 2021-22

The appeals filed by the assessee, Shri Yasir Arafat, were dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) either on account of non-prosecution or for non-condonation of the delay. The assessee submitted that due to continuous bereavement in the family, he was

Read summary

Smt. Shanti Devi vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.6468/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘A’13 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

The appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, in Appeal No. NFAC/2018-19/10397076 dated 30.09.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act,

Read summary

ITA Nos. 1311 & 1312/Del/2025 Mohd Javed (AY: 2017-18)

ITA Nos. 1311 & 1312/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH, DELHI9 Jan 2026

The case involves Mohd Javed, who filed appeals against penalty orders dated 11.06.2021 and 14.06.2021 under sections 272A(1)(d)/271A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, imposed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi for the assessmen

Read summary

Shamji Kanji Zaru vs DCIT

I.T.A. No. 6084 to 6090/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'F' Bench, Mumbai28 Jan 2026

The assessee, Shamji Kanji Zaru, is an individual engaged in the telecom business under the name 'Raj Telecom'. He is not maintaining books of accounts and has declared profit on a presumptive basis under section 44AD of the Income Tax Act,

Read summary

Nitin Ramchandra Kalambe Vs. ITO, Ward-2(2)

I.T.A. No. 7424/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Mumbai23 Jan 2026

The assessee, Nitin Ramchandra Kalambe, filed his return of income showing total income at Rs. 8,85,460/-. His case was selected for scrutiny under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following a search and seizure operation involving

Read summary

Mr. Dhananjay Mahadeo Sonsurkar v/s. Income Tax Officer/Assessment Unit, ITO/CIT(A)

ITA No.6044/MUM/2025INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI16 Jan 2026

The case involves a penalty order passed under section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for non-compliance with notices issued under section 142(1) of the Act. The assessee, Mr. Dhananjay Mahadeo Sonsurkar, did not comply with the not

Read summary

B.H. TRADING CO. vs. DCIT, CC-29, NEW DELHI

ITA No. 4570/DEL/2024 (AY 2015-16), ITA No. 4572/DEL/2024 (AY 2014-15), ITA No. 4573/DEL/2024 (AY 2016-17), ITA No. 4574/DEL/2024 (AY 2017-18), ITA No. 4575/DEL/2024 (AY 2019-20), ITA No. 4576/DEL/2024 (AY 2020-21), ITA No. 4577/DEL/2024 (AY 2018-19)INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DELHI18 Feb 2025

These 07 appeals by the Assessee, B.H. TRADING CO., are directed against the separate orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-30, Delhi pertaining to the assessment years 2015-16, 2014-15, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2018-19. The appeals relat

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning