Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–13 of 13 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
M/s Majestic Sales Promotion Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Cir-8(1)
The assessee, M/s Majestic Sales Promotion Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 13.09.2011 declaring a total income of ₹12,83,718/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessed under section 143(3) on 24.03.2014. Subsequently, the c…
Neena Bihani Vs. ITO Ward 49(2)
The assessee, Neena Bihani, filed a return of income declaring a total income of ₹2,35,680/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information that the assessee had purchased shares of Jackson Investment Ltd. worth ₹1,30,17,199/-, and the so…
Frontier Warehousing P. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle 7(1)
This is an appeal preferred by Frontier Warehousing P. Ltd. against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee raised several legal issues challenging the assessment order. The prim…
The Hooghly Mills Company Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle -1(2), Kolkata
The assessee, The Hooghly Mills Company Ltd., filed a return of income on 30.09.2008, declaring total income of ₹Nil. The case was selected for scrutiny and an assessment order under section 143(3)/154 of the Act dated 19.06.2014 was passed…
Parmod Kumar Vs. Central Circle 18
This appeal is filed by the assessee, Parmod Kumar, against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi, dated 31.01.2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The proceedings were initiated under notice dated 27.04.2…
Vikash Agarwal Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The facts in brief are that the notice under section 148 of the Act was issued on 19.06.2021. The assessee requested the Assessing Officer (AO)/Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) on 06.01.2022 for supplying the reasons filed with JAO on 07.01.20…
Swami Vivekanand College vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(4)
For the assessment year 2015-16, the assessee, Swami Vivekanand College, did not file any return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. Based on information from the INSIGHT portal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) found that the assessee h…
Praveen Kumar Patwa HUF Vs ITO Ward-47 (2), Kolkata
The assessee, Praveen Kumar Patwa HUF, has filed an appeal against the order dated 23.05.2025 passed by the ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the assessment year 2015-2016. The primary contention of the assessee i…
M/s Dalmia Impex Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee-company, M/s Dalmia Impex Private Limited, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2014–15 declaring a total income of ₹1,57,07,120, which was revised to ₹1,52,74,460/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and an ass…
M/s Urban Nirmal LLP Vs. ITO, Ward 12(1)
The assessee, M/s Urban Nirmal LLP, filed the original return of income on 29.09.2013, declaring a total income of ₹20,56,820/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and an assessment was framed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 22.03.2016, assessing …
Shri. Kumaraswamy Gangadharaiah Kallur Vs. DCIT
The assessee filed a return of income on 28.02.2015 declaring a total income of Rs.1,08,58,460/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment and passed an Order under section 143(3) of the Act on 16.12.2016, accepting the return of…
AJAY PRATAP RAMAN VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1)(5), GHAZIABAD
The assessee, Ajay Pratap Raman, made cash deposits of Rs. 10,00,000/- in his bank account with Bank of Baroda, Ghaziabad during the demonetization period (09.11.2016 to 30.12.2016). The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had no…
Build Tec Construction vs. DCIT
The case involves an appeal filed by Build Tec Construction against the order of the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 31.07.2024 in Appeal No. NFAC/2012-13/10231118 for AY 2013-14. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including the inval…