Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 86 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
ATOP Products Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT
The assessee, ATOP Products Pvt. Ltd, filed an appeal against the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which confirmed the disallowance of ₹ 27,86,561/- on account of bad debts written off. The assessee is a privat…
Bindal Vanijya Pvt. Ltd vs ACIT
The appeal in ITA No.1387/Del/2026 for AY 2013-14, arises out of the order of the ld Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi dated 14.01.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3)/263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated…
M/s Double ‘A’ Farms Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 1989-90, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the “CIT(A)”], involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Ac…
Yash Tuteja vs. DCIT, Central Circle-08, New Delhi
The appeals arise out of the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-25, Delhi dated 31.01.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 30.03.2022 by the Assessing Officer, D…
Amit Paul vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre
The appeal in ITA No.5088/Del/2024 for AY 2017-18, arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 22.06.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 21.12.20…
M/s. Unitech Reality Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Unitech Residential Resorts Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle-27(1), Delhi
The assessees, M/s. Unitech Reality Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Unitech Residential Resorts Ltd., filed appeals ITA Nos.4408 & 4409/Del/2019 for assessment years 2013-14 and 2010-11 against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], New Delh…
Reeta Chauhan vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Karnal
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1069171558(1), dated …
M/s. J.V. Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle-13(1), Delhi
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2008-09 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s-26 order dated 26.08.2025. The appeal challenges the validity of the impugned reopening set into mot…
OSG (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT
The assessee, OSG (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for A.Y. 2021-22 declaring a total income of Rs.9,85,29,547/-. The company is engaged in the sale of tungsten solid carbide metal cutting tools, end mills, etc. by importing th…
Guardian Portfolio Consultants Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(4), Delhi
The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2009-10 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-22's order dated 25.03.2019, passed in case no. 89/18-19/CIT(A)-22, New Delhi, involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Incom…
M/s. Airports Authority of India vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1), New Delhi
The assessee, M/s. Airports Authority of India, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, New Delhi, dated 07.03.2017, involving proceedings under section 143(3)/254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal wa…
Punit Malik vs. ACIT, Circle 70(1), Delhi
The Assessing Officer passed a rectification order under section 154 read with section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, noting that the returned income of the assessee was incorrectly accepted. The salary income of the assessee was deter…
Shri Parasnath Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-2, Muzaffarnagar
The assessee’s case was reopened by the Assessing Officer on receiving information from the D.G., Central Excise Intelligence that the assessee company had evaded union excise duty on account of clandestine sale of MS ingots. Originally, as…
Sh. Tejinder Singh Vs. Income Tax Officer, Circle-28(1), Delhi
The assessee, Sh. Tejinder Singh, filed an appeal for the assessment year 2017-18 against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi. The appeal was filed under section 143(3) …
Maharaja Agarsain Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-16(2), New Delhi
This appeal pertains to the assessment year 2012-13 and arises against the order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi in case no. 10241/2019-20. The proceedings are under section 147/143(3) of th…
AT Kearney Ltd. Vs. ACIT
The assessee, AT Kearney Ltd., filed twin appeals ITA Nos.6939/Del/2019 and 1694/Del/2022 for assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17 against the orders of DCIT, International Taxation, New Delhi and CIT(A), Delhi dated 27.06.2019 and 30.05.20…
M/s. Nugreen Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-16(1), Delhi
This appeal by M/s. Nugreen Energy Pvt. Ltd. for the assessment year 2020-21 is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi, dated 01.03.2024. The CIT(A)/NFAC had refuse…
ITA No.2631/Del/2023
The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi, which deleted an addition of Rs. 3,73,23,412/- on account of commission charged @ 2% on bogus sales. The assessee, Sh. P…
Dongkuk Steel India Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/ACIT/National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi
The appeal in ITA No. 545/Del/2021, filed by the assessee Dongkuk Steel India Pvt. Ltd. for the Assessment Year 2016-17, has arisen from the assessment order dated 25.03.2021 in DIN & Order No. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2020-21/1031767283(1) passed…
Prakash and Sh. Ram Dass vs. ITO
The case involves two assessees, Prakash and Sh. Ram Dass, who sold their respective agricultural lands situated in the village Daulatpur, Tehsil Kapashera, New Delhi, during the previous year. The lower authorities considered these lands a…