Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 30 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Vatsalya B Wing Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer – Ward 20(3)(1)
The Assessee, Vatsalya B Wing Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd., filed returns of income for the Assessment Years 2011-2012, 2013-2014, 2014-2015, and 2015-2016, claiming deductions under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The deducti…
Sukir Ladaku Naik Vs ITO, 28(3)(1), Mumbai
The assessee, Sukir Ladaku Naik, is an individual and proprietor of Sanjay Country Bar, engaged in the business of selling Indian-made liquor. All sales during the relevant financial year were in cash, which were deposited in bank accounts …
Sterling Court F Wing Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-31(2)(1)
The assessee, Sterling Court F Wing Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15, claiming deductions under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Offic…
Santosh Laujari Gupta Vs ITO – 33(3)(3)
The assessee, Santosh Laujari Gupta, is running a proprietorship concern named M/s. Meltstar Metals, trading in iron and steel. During the assessment year 2009-10, the Assessing Officer (AO) received information from the DGIT investigation …
Sangeeta Motilal Shahani Vs. ITO 27(3)(1)
The assessee, Sangeeta Motilal Shahani, filed her return on 30.03.2013, which was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and selected for scrutiny under section 143(3) of the Act. The assessment was completed with an ad…
Sachin Kishor Sheth Vs ITO, Ward-42(1)(5), Mumbai
These two appeals by the assessee, Sachin Kishor Sheth, are directed against the separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / NFAC, Delhi, both dated 17.10.2025 for Assessment Years 2022-23 & 2023-24 respectively. C…
Prasad Siddharth Thorat vs ITO, Ward – 14(3)(1)
The assessee, Prasad Siddharth Thorat, filed an appeal against the order passed by the CIT(A) disallowing a deduction of Rs. 2,00,000 claimed under Section 80GGC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee had made a donation to the Rashtriya…
O P Jindal Foundation Vs ITO, Exem. Ward-2(2), Mumbai
These two appeals by the assessee, O P Jindal Foundation, are directed against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A), ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Gurugram dated 18.08.2025 and 29.08.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 & 2019-20 respectively. The asse…
Niraj Pravinchandra Doshi Vs ITO,Ward-19(2)(4), Mumbai
The assessee, Niraj Pravinchandra Doshi, a trader of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, had his case reopened based on information from DGIT (Inv.) alleging that he was a beneficiary of bogus purchases from six parties. The purchases from thes…
Nilesh Premjibhai Patel Vs. ITO, Ward 32(2)(4)
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee, Nilesh Premjibhai Patel, challenging the order dated 31.03.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year …
Nadeem Mohammed Iqbal Patni vs Income Tax Officer Ward 25(3)(1), Mumbai
The appellant, Nadeem Mohammed Iqbal Patni, filed an appeal against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which dismissed his appeal against the Assessment Order dated 11/10/2023 under Section 147 read with …
Mrs. Geeta Narendra Gandhi Vs. ITO Ward 19(1)(1), Mumbai
The assessee, Mrs. Geeta Narendra Gandhi, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2019-20, declaring long-term capital gains on the sale of an immovable property. The sale consideration reported was as per the registered sale deed,…
Mr. Silvester Ligorio Rebello Vs. ITO-19(2)(2)
The assessee, Mr. Silvester Ligorio Rebello, did not file his return of income for the Assessment Year 2010-11. However, it was revealed from the ITS details that he sold an immovable property for Rs. 52,50,000/- during the year, leading to…
Mr. Indrajit Mahendra Khona Vs ITO, Ward-1(4), Thane
This appeal by assessee, Mr. Indrajit Mahendra Khona, is directed against the assessment order of the ld. CIT(A)/ADDL/JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar dated 08.07.2025 for Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee purchased a flat from Cosmos Group for Rs.…
M/s. Dollar Chunilal Modi HUF Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-42(1)(2)
The assessee, M/s. Dollar Chunilal Modi HUF, filed its return of income on 28/03/2014 declaring a total income of Rs. 4,21,340/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Subsequently, the assessment was re…
Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala Vs. ITO, Ward-23(1)(6)
The assessee, Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. 7,55,020/-. A search and seizure action under section 132 of the Income Tax Act was carried out in the case…
Meherzin Co Operative Housing Society Limited Vs ITO, Ward-25(2)(1), Mumbai
This appeal by Meherzin Co Operative Housing Society Limited is directed against the assessment order of the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 15.07.2025 for Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee claimed deduction of interest income earned from vari…
Khadija Sainul Abeeb Nalakath Vs. Addl./JCIT (Appeals)-4, Kolkata
The present appeal is instituted by Khadija Sainul Abeeb Nalakath, challenging the order of Addl./JCIT(A)-Kolkata dated 29.02.2024, which upheld the restriction of exemption under section 10(10AA)(ii) to Rs. 3,00,000 instead of granting ful…
Kalpana Nitin Shah Vs. ITO 19(2)(2)
The assessee, Kalpana Nitin Shah, did not file her return of income for the relevant year. Information in the NMS Module indicated that she sold an immovable property for Rs. 55,00,000/- during AY 2011-12. Since no ITR was filed within the …
Jayantilal Moolchand Vanigota Vs ITO, Ward-42(2)(3), Mumbai
The assessee, Jayantilal Moolchand Vanigota, filed an appeal against the assessment order of the ld. CIT(A)/ADDL/JCIT(A)-6, Chennai dated 11.07.2025 for Assessment Year 2023-24. The primary ground of appeal was the denial of the benefit of …