Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 15 of 5 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Rishiraj Hitendra Bhandari vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 24(3)(1)

ITA No. 7156/MUM/2025Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 'D' Bench19 Jan 2026

The appeal emanates from the order passed under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income-Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, dated 22.09.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee has challenged

Read summary

Rikhabchand Vachraj Mehta vs. The Income Tax Officer-Circle 19(3)

ITA No. 7238/MUM/2025INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI “D” BENCH19 Jan 2026

The assessment in this case was completed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, wherein the assessed income was determined at Rs. 50,73,117/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition under section 14A read with Rule 8D amoun

Read summary

Mirador Construction Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

ITA No. 7259/MUM/2025INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI “D” BENCH23 Jan 2026

The assessment in this case was completed under section 143(3) of the Act by an order dated 27.12.2019. The Assessing Officer brought to tax a sum of Rs. 1,53,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act. The reason given

Read summary

Manish Bhavanji Bheda vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 20(1)

ITA No. 7252/MUM/2025Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 'D' Bench19 Jan 2026

The assessee filed his return of income declaring a loss of Rs. 24,052,648/-, which was selected for scrutiny. After issuance of notice calling for necessary information and documentation, the Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs.

Read summary

Income Tax Officer, Ward-19(3)(1) vs Raashi Sawhney

ITA No. 7089/Mum/2025, 7090/Mum/2025, 7091/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 'D' Bench13 Jan 2026

The assessment was completed under sections 147, 144, and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, where the Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax a sum of Rs. 8,81,25,000/- under sections 69 and 115BBE of the Act as 'unexplained investments'. The

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning