Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 120 of 124 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Vimaldevi Shyamsunder Khetan vs. ITO

ITA 2951/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Vimladevi Shyamsunder Khetan, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi dated 24.02.2026 for the assessment year 2015-16. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that

Read summary

Vidhi S. Khandelwal vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA 4215/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Vidhi S. Khandelwal, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2017-18. The assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment by the Assessing Officer, arguing that

Read summary

Vazirani Foundation Vs. CIT Exemptions

ITA No. 6434/Mum/2026 & 6435/Mum/2026INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'F' BENCH, MUMBAI9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Vazirani Foundation, had filed an application for registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) rejected the application, stating that the required documents were not

Read summary

The Society of the Poor Sisters of Our Lady vs. DCIT – Exempt, Circle-2, Mumbai

ITA 4236/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench9 Sept 2026

The assessee, The Society of the Poor Sisters of Our Lady, a public charitable trust, filed an appeal against the order of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2016-17. The assessee challenged th

Read summary

State Bank of India vs. ACIT

ITA No. 3841/MUM/2026 (AY: 2016-17) & ITA No. 2221/MUM/2026 (AY: 2016-17)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The appellant, State Bank of India, is a branch of the bank. The Assessing Officer passed an order for non-deduction of TDS on reimbursement of Leave Travel Concession (LTC) for Assessment Year 2016-17. The bank had not deducted tax at sour

Read summary

SRINIVASA MOHAN TUMATI Vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 42(3)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4081/MUM/2026 and ITA 4082/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, a retired employee of NABARD, received leave encashment of ₹20,15,707/- during the assessment year 2020-21 and arrears of leave encashment of ₹4,00,661/- during the assessment year 2023-24. The assessee claimed these amounts a

Read summary

Girish Chimanlal Sangani vs. DCIT-Central Circle

ITA No. 6263/M/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench 'G'9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Girish Chimanlal Sangani, purchased 26,929 shares of M/s Prerna Infrabuild Ltd. in September 2010 for Rs. 13,15,923/- and sold them during June to October 2014 for Rs. 14,20,053/-, earning a long-term capital gain of Rs. 1,04,

Read summary

Shri Hitesh Ugamraj Mehta vs. Assessing Officer

ITA 223/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Shri Hitesh Ugamraj Mehta, is the proprietor of M/s Gudhiya Gold Creations, engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading in gold jewellery. The assessee filed his return of income reporting total income at Rs.32,32,820

Read summary

Shree Cutchi Dasa Oswal Jain Shikshan Prasarak Samiti Trust vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions

ITA 6579 & 6580/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Shree Cutchi Dasa Oswal Jain Shikshan Prasarak Samiti Trust, is a charitable trust that filed applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Inc

Read summary

Sharekhan Limited vs. DCIT, Circle 15(3)(2)

ITA No. 5345 & 5347/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench9 Sept 2026

The case involves appeals by Sharekhan Limited against the order dated 23.03.2026 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre/Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals concern the

Read summary

R.A Shah And Co. vs. DCIT, Circle 19(3)

ITA 553/Mum/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, R.A Shah And Co., filed its return of income on 08.09.2010, reporting total income at Rs.91,99,430/-. Reopening proceedings were initiated by issuing a notice under Section 148 dated 13.02.2015, based on information from a sea

Read summary

Ravindra Matadin Modi vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA 2639/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. NFAC dated 06-Jan-2026 for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including the nullity of the assessment order, jurisdictional issues, t

Read summary

Pradeep H. Raheja vs. CIT (Appeals), NFAC

ITA 7740/MUM/2026, SA 133/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee filed the return of income for A.Y. 2018-19 on 07.10.2018 declaring total income of Rs.12,16,760/-. The case was selected for complete scrutiny. During the assessment proceedings, the assessee had purchased an immovable propert

Read summary

Nishicha Impex Private Limited vs. DCIT CC 4(4)

ITA 6635/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Nishicha Impex Private Limited, filed an appeal challenging the order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Mumbai, under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee had filed

Read summary

Nikita Shilpin Tater vs. ACIT, Central Circle 8(2)

ITA 4095/MUM/2026, ITA 4096/MUM/2026, ITA 4097/MUM/2026, ITA 4098/MUM/2026, ITA 4099/MUM/2026, ITA 4100/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Nikita Shilpin Tater, filed appeals against separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2018-19. The appeals were heard together due to common facts and interconnected iss

Read summary

M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research and Development Centre v. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)

ITA 4343/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research and Development Centre, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2021-22. The assessee claimed a deduction for advance rent which

Read summary

Mustanshir Abbas Hussain vs ITO, Ward – 24(2)(1), Mumbai

ITA No. 6853/MUM/2026 (AY: 2014-15)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Mustanshir Abbas Hussain, along with his father, purchased a flat in an under-construction project in 2007 for Rs. 84,96,000/-. The builder issued an allotment letter dated 11.12.2007, and the sale agreement was registered on

Read summary

Mufti Kifayatullah Memorial Trust vs. CIT(Exemption)

ITA 93/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Mufti Kifayatullah Memorial Trust, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai, dated 28.10.2022, which denied the approval under section 80G of the Act. The assessee submit

Read summary

Kavita Manish Kheni vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA 3171/MUM/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

The assessee, Kavita Manish Kheni, filed her return of income declaring total income at 'NIL', after claiming exemption under section 10(38) of the Act amounting to Rs.35,97,610/- in respect of gain on sale of shares. The Assessing Officer

Read summary

Jyoti Satish Naik As Wife And Legal Heir of Late Satish P Naik Vs. ITO, Ward 4(4), Thane

ITA No.2373/Mum/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'F' Bench, Mumbai9 Sept 2026

Late Shri Satish Pandurang Naik was an individual deriving income from various sources. He expired on 26.05.2011. His wife, Smt. Jyoti Satish Naik, filed the return of income for the year under consideration on 31.07.2011 in her capacity as

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning