Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 84 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
DCIT vs. Nature Pearls Private Limited
The appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order dated 04.09.2025 of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising out of the asse…
Deepak Pawar vs. DCIT, Circle 43(1)
The assessee is engaged in the business of trading in raw material for CPVC Pipe industry since 2016 under the name of 'Deepjyoti Enterprises'. The assessee had filed its original return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act on 31.8.2022, declar…
Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH vs. ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi
The appellant, a German company, is part of Springer Nature Group and acts as a commissionaire/sales representative for affiliated SNG publisher entities. It enters into subscription agreements with customers, collects subscription fees, an…
Raidenbit Interactive Pvt. Ltd. vs. Assessing Officer, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)
The assessee/appellant is aggrieved against the lower authorities' action treating its share capital/premium of Rs.6,76,72,921/- as well as unexplained investments in mutual funds and sales promotion expenditure as not allowable in the asse…
Ashriya Consultive (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO
During the year, the assessee company was engaged in the business of wholesale and retail of textile and other related products. The return of income for A.Y. 2022-23 was e-filed by the assessee in ITR-3 on 31/11/2022 declaring total income…
Mandeep Singh vs. DCIT, CC-I, Noida
A search and seizure at Mansam Noida Vaults in Locker No. 1172048, F8 in the name of Sh. Mandeep Singh was conducted on 01.02.2022. During the search, cash amounting to Rs. 23,80,050/- was found and seized from the locker. The assessee file…
DCIT, CC-II, NOIDA VS. SURJEET SINGH
The assessee, Surjeet Singh, is a proprietorship concern mainly engaged in real estate business. A search and seizure operation was conducted on 15.02.2022, during which various incriminating documents and cash amounting to Rs. 50,15,000/- …
Bain & Company, Inc. vs. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Bain & Company, Inc., a foreign company with tax residency in the USA, is engaged in providing consultancy services and support services to its subsidiaries. The main points of contention in this appeal pertain to receipts for…
M/s Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd. vs Asst. CIT, Central Circle-30
The assessee, M/s Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) confirming disallowance of Rs. 8,50,90,660/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and disallowance of Rs. 68,37,523/- claimed b…
Sonica Sachdeva Through The Legal vs. ACIT, Circle 2(1)(1)
The appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessment was framed by ACIT, Circle 2(1)(1), Ghaziabad for the assessment year 2022-23 u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax…
NEW DELHI UP ROAD CARRIERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. PR. CIT-4, NEW DELHI
The assessee company filed its return for the AY 2022-23 on 22.10.2022, admitting total income of Rs. 88,74,280/-. The case was selected for scrutiny assessment through CASS for reasons including large value receipt or repayment of loans ot…
Raman Kumar Beri v. Income Tax Officer
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2022-23 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083299198(1) dated 04.12.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The lower authorities m…
S K Lumber Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward -23(3), New Delhi-110014
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2022-23 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082574224(1) dated 13.11.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee…
Sh. Pawan Kumar Laur vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2022-23 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083072449(1), dated …
Jyoti Ahuja vs. ITO
The assessee filed her return of income declaring an income of Rs.4,06,410/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had declared commission income without substantiating the source. The Ass…
Suchi Agarwal Vs. ACIT, Ghaziabad
This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Noida, dated 15.04.2025 against the assessment order dated 20.10.2023 passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 pertaining to As…
Kachan Metals Pvt. Ltd. vs. DY. CIT, Circle -8(1)
The assessee, Kachan Metals Pvt. Ltd., filed a return of income declaring a total income of ₹5,57,87,617/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act, and a disallowance of ₹5,18,414/- was made for delayed payment of ESI and …
Maharajapur Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. vs ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru
This is an appeal filed by Maharajapur Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Addl/JCIT(A)-3, Bengaluru, passed on 11.01.2024 under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A…
Shree Capital Services Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Circle-5(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Shree Capital Services Ltd., filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2022-23 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,55,20,15,750/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) processed the return and denied the claim under Section 115BA…
Rahee Infratech Limited Vs. DCIT, CC-4(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Rahee Infratech Limited, is a manufacturing concern and a contractor of Indian Railway. It filed an income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23 declaring a total income of Rs. 31,50,65,330/- and claimed taxation at 22% u…