Skip to main content

VSR Infratech Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Case No: ITA No.3154/Del/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench
Date: 9/23/2024

Parties Involved

appellantVSR Infratech Private Limited
respondentCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Facts Summary

The appellant/assessee, VSR Infratech Private Limited, engaged in the business of property dealing and construction, filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) on 30.11.2015 declaring income of Rs.12,114/-. The case was picked up for scrutiny, and the Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed commitment charges of Rs.3,19,87,720/- and disallowed set off of brought forward losses of Rs.1,31,47,983/-. The appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), who dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution and on merit. The appellant/assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The Tribunal heard both parties and found that there was a delay in filing the appeal but also found sufficient cause for condoning the delay. The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remitted the issues of disallowance of commitment charges and brought forward losses to the CIT(A) for a decision on merit.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in disposing off the appeal without serving any Physical Copy of Notice upon the Appellant and without adjudicating the Merits of the Case.
  • 2. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition made by the assessing officer amounting to INR 3,19,87,720/- against returned income of INR 12,114/-.
  • 3. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition for commitment charges amounting to INR 3,19,87,720/- alleging that the treatment for commitment charges is in contrary to the method of revenue recognition.
  • 4. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in treating the commitment charges as 'borrowing cost' and adding in the cost of construction of the projects undertaken.
  • 5. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in not providing the benefit of brought forward losses amounting to INR 1,31,47,983/- which were duly claimed in the Income tax return filed for AY 2015-16 on 30.11.2015.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning