Swapnil Anil Ahirkar v/s Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Swapnil Anil Ahirkar, filed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–1, Nagpur, for the assessment year 2010–11. The appeal was filed on the grounds that the ex-party order passed by the learned CIT(A) was illegal, invalid, and bad in law. The assessee also argued that the CIT(A) did not consider the adjournment application filed by the assessee and dismissed the appeal without issuing a speaking order. The assessee requested another opportunity to substantiate their case before the CIT(A). The revenue, represented by Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, supported the orders passed by the CIT(A).…

Legal Issues

• 1. The ex-party order passed by the CIT(A) is illegal, invalid, and bad in law.
• 2. The CIT(A) did not consider the adjournment application filed by the assessee.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Rajendra Shankarrao Jadhao v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Nagpur bench

• Sanjay Varshneya Vs DC/ ACIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18, 2018-19Allowed

• Intensive Khadi And Rural Development Centre Vs ITO (Exemption), Ward-2(1), Durgapur

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2013-14Partly Allowed

• Nanshi Export Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer-15(2)(1), Mumbai

  Mumbai Bench 'B' benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Nagpur Nagarik Sahakar Bank Karamchari Path Sanstha Maryadit v/s Income Tax Officer

  Nagpur bench

• Abdul Asif Abdul Kadir Abdul v/s Income Tax Officer

  Nagpur bench