Rajendra Shankarrao Jadhao v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 02/04/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for the assessment year 2014–15. The assessee has raised several grounds for appeal, primarily arguing that the ex-parte order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, National Faceless Appeal Centre, is illegal, invalid, and bad in law. The assessee claims that notices of hearing were sent to an incorrect email address, and they did not receive any notice of hearing, thereby not being provided an opportunity to be heard. Additionally, the assessee contests the additions made by the assessing officer, arguing that they are unjustified, unwarranted, and excessive.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the ex-parte order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, National Faceless Appeal Centre, is illegal, invalid, and bad in law?
• 2. Whether the additions made by the assessing officer are justified, warranted, and reasonable?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Abdul Asif Abdul Kadir Abdul v/s Income Tax Officer

  Nagpur bench

• Pramodkumar Matabadal Mishra v/s Income Tax Officer

  Nagpur bench

• Sohanlal Vardichand Jain Vs. DCIT CC 1(1)

  SMC Bench Mumbai benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• Miltech Industries Pvt. Ltd. v/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Nagpur bench

• M/s Gyanchand Poddar HUF vs. ITO Ward 43(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2013-2014Allowed

• Shelter Infra Projects Ltd vs. A.O, Circle-11(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata bench