Subros Limited vs. Addl.CIT, Range 24
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Subros Limited, filed appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for the Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2020-21. The assessee claimed losses on Mark to Market (M to M) and deductions under section 35(2AB) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) sustained the disallowance of these claims. The assessee argued that the disallowance was erroneous and relied on various precedents. The Tribunal considered the submissions and decided in favor of the assessee on certain grounds.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Disallowance of employees' contribution towards PF and ESI.
- 2. Disallowance of Mark to Market (M to M) losses.
- 3. Additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
4 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Mohmed Hasib Tajamul Shaikh Vs ITO
Surat benchITA No. 2340/Del/2026
Delhi benchGandhar Oil Refinery (India) Ltd. vs. ACIT, CC-5(1), Mumbai
Mumbai benchIDFC Limited vs. The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai benchE Factor Adventure Tourism P. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly AllowedChaphekar Suspensions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle 1(1), Pune
Pune bench