Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Ltd. vs. ACIT, CC-5(1), Mumbai
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee company, engaged in business, filed its income return for the assessment year 2016-17 on 29.11.2016, disclosing a total income of Rs.12,27,87,970/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act. The case was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS, and notices were issued under sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) referred the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determining the arm's length price (ALP). The AO disallowed deductions claimed under section 35(2AB) of the Act, amounting to Rs.19,21,303/-, as the R&D expenses were not approved by the DSIR. Additionally, the AO disallowed Rs.17,278/- for delay in payment of employees' contribution to ESI and Rs.4,88,070/- for advances written off without clarity on the facts. The AO assessed the total income at Rs.12,52,14,621/- and passed the order under section 143(3) of the Act on 24.12.2019.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Disallowance of deduction claimed under section 35(2AB) of the Act amounting to Rs.19,21,303/-.
- 2. Disallowance of deduction amounting to Rs.17,278/- on account of delay in payment of contribution to ESI.
- 3. Disallowance of claim of advances written-off amounting to Rs.4,88,070/-.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Similar Judgements
ITA Nos.2525 & 2826/Chny/2026 M/s. Anabond Ltd.
Chennai benchIncome Tax Officer New Delhi Vs. Poly Medicure Limited
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18DismissedRockwell Automation India Pvt. Ltd Vs. ACIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2016-17Partly AllowedHughes Communications India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle-12(1), Delhi
Delhi Bench benchAY 2010-11AllowedChaphekar Suspensions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle 1(1), Pune
Pune benchE Factor Adventure Tourism P. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed