Skip to main content

Shri Jayasankar Natarajan Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 1(2), Chennai

Case No: 3211/CHNY/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘A’ Bench, Chennai
Date: 1/23/2026

Parties Involved

appellantShri Jayasankar Natarajan
respondentThe Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 1(2), Chennai

Facts Summary

This appeal was filed by the assessee, Shri Jayasankar Natarajan, against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 30.10.2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee raised a legal ground challenging the validity of the assumption of jurisdiction for issuance of notice under section 148A of the Act. The notice under section 148 of the Act was issued by the Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 1(2), Chennai, which the assessee argued lacked jurisdiction in view of the Notification issued by the CBDT dated 29.03.2022. The Notification formulated a Scheme called “the e-assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022” which mandates that notices under section 148 of the Act shall be issued through automated allocation in a faceless manner.

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Validity of the assumption of jurisdiction for issuance of notice under section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

7 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning