Skip to main content

Shri Ganesan Neelamegam Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kancheepuram

Case No: ITA No. 3131/CHNY/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai
Date: 1/28/2026

Parties Involved

appellantShri Ganesan Neelamegam
respondentThe Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kancheepuram

Facts Summary

This appeal was filed by the assessee, Shri Ganesan Neelamegam, against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 16.10.2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The relevant Assessment Year is 2018-19. The assessee challenged the validity of the assumption of jurisdiction for issuance of notice under section 148A of the Act. The notice under section 148 of the Act was issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kancheepuram, which the assessee argued lacked jurisdiction in view of the Notification issued by the CBDT dated 29.03.2022, which formulated the 'e-assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022'. The assessee relied on the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of TVS Credit Services Ltd. v. DCIT in W.P. No. 22402 of 2024, arguing that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer are void ab initio.

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Validity of the assumption of jurisdiction for issuance of notice under section 148A of the Act.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

5 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning