Shri Balu Ram vs ITO, Ward 7(2), Jaipur

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

Shri Balu Ram, the appellant, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 16-11-2023 for the assessment year 2011-12. The appeal was filed on the grounds that the appellate authority erred in its order by not considering the sale deed signed by all members in their capacity as coparceners of the HUF, not considering the ancestral nature of the property, and not considering the value of the residential property in the same area. The appellant also argued that the decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal in Satya Dev Sharma Vs ITO(Jaipur Tribunal 2014) was applicable to his case. The appellant further contended that the Assessing Officer did not consider the expenses of actual improvement cost of agricultural land and the value of the sale should be considered as agricultural land. The appellant also sought to adduce additional evidence to substantiate his claims.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the appellate authority erred in considering the sale deed signed by all members in their capacity as coparceners of the HUF?
• 2. Whether the appellate authority erred in not considering the ancestral nature of the property?
• 3. Whether the appellate authority erred in not considering the value of the residential property in the same area?
• 4. Whether the decision of Satya Dev Sharma Vs ITO(Jaipur Tribunal 2014) is applicable to the appellant's case?
• 5. Whether the appellate authority erred in not considering the expenses of actual improvement cost of agricultural land?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Suken Suresh Mehta Vs. Income Tax Officer

• Mrs. Geeta Narendra Gandhi Vs. ITO Ward 19(1)(1), Mumbai

  SMC Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2019-20Partly Allowed

• Rina Ray

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-2019Allowed

• Kuldip Kumar Goel vs. ACIT (1)(1)

  Delhi Bench ‘E’ benchAY 2012-13Partly Allowed

• Mohammed Khalid Habib Parihar v/s Income Tax Officer, Ward 31(2)(1)

  Mumbai bench

• Murtuza Kothari vs. ITO, Ward-19(2)(2)

  Mumbai benchAY 2015-16Partly Allowed