Skip to main content

Mrs. Geeta Narendra Gandhi Vs. ITO Ward 19(1)(1), Mumbai

Case No: ITA No.7244/Mum/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'SMC' BENCH, MUMBAI
Date: 1/28/2026

Parties Involved

appellantMrs. Geeta Narendra Gandhi
respondentITO Ward 19(1)(1), Mumbai

Facts Summary

The assessee, Mrs. Geeta Narendra Gandhi, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2019-20, declaring long-term capital gains on the sale of an immovable property. The sale consideration reported was as per the registered sale deed, while the value adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority (SDV) was higher. During processing of the return under section 143(1)(a), the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) made an adjustment to substitute the declared sale consideration with the SDV in accord

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the learned appellate authority erred in confirming the addition under section 143(1) read with section 50C of the Act.
  • 2. Whether the learned appellate authority erred in deciding the appeal in violation of the principles of natural justice.

1 more legal issue analysed in this judgement.

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning