Secured Home Finance Ltd. Vs. PCIT-5, Kolkata
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee company, Secured Home Finance Ltd., filed its return of income declaring a total loss of Rs. 3,98,506/-. The return was selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions under section 14A of Rs. 34,314/- and Rs. 23,048/- towards miscellaneous expenses, assessing the total income at Rs 57,360. Subsequently, the order passed under section 143(3) was picked up for revision under section 263 of the Act by PCIT-5, Kolkata, which cancelled the AO's order with a direction to pass a speaking and reasoned order. The AO then sent a show cause notice to the assessee asking for detailed information. The AO disallowed 30% of the sum of Rs. 65,11,945/- paid to contractors under section 194C, amounting to Rs. 19,53,583/-. The assessee challenged this order before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)- NFAC, Delhi (CIT(A)), but the appeal was dismissed in limine for non-response to notices. The assessee then appealed to the ITAT.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Delay in filing the appeal by the assessee.
- 2. Whether the appeal should be dismissed in limine for non-appearance before the CIT(A).
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Punit Malik vs. ACIT, Circle 70(1), Delhi
Delhi Benches 'F', New Delhi benchAY 2017-18AllowedDCIT (TDS)-2(3), Mumbai Vs. Tata Play Limited
Mumbai benchAY 2016-17DismissedIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Jermel's Accademy Vs. I.T.O., Ward -1(4), Siliguri
Kolkata 'A' Bench benchAY 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2017-18AllowedAshok vs. CIT(A)
Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi benchAY 2017-18AllowedAman Sharma vs ITO