Skip to main content

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Case No: ITA No.3510/Chny/2025, ITA No.3511/Chny/2025, ITA No.3512/Chny/2025, ITA No.3513/Chny/2025, ITA No.3514/Chny/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Date: 1/23/2026

Parties Involved

appellantMohandoss Gandhi P No.433/10, Prop. M/s. D&R Agencies
respondentIncome Tax Officer, Ward-1, Thanjavur

Facts Summary

The appellant, Mohandoss Gandhi, did not file a regular return of income for the Assessment Year 2018-19 under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) formed an opinion that the appellant had made cash deposits, withdrawals, and investments in equity shares, which led to the belief that income had escaped assessment. Consequently, a notice under section 148 was issued, and after non-compliance by the appellant, the AO proceeded to frame an assessment order under sections

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without entering into the merits of the addition?

Precedents Relied Upon

1 precedent cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI - Opakhya | Opakhya