Sadayandi Pothiraj & Others v. The DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Chennai
Case No: ITA Nos. 1075-1080/Chny/2023, ITA Nos. 1076-1079/Chny/2023, ITA Nos. 989-993/Chny/2023
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai
Date: 27 Sept 2024
Parties Involved
appellantSadayandi Pothiraj
appellantSadayandi Magesh
appellantSadayandi Murugesh
appellantSadayandi Ashok
appellantSadayandi Ramesh
respondentThe DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Chennai
Facts Summary
The appellants, directors of M/s Pothys Pvt. Ltd., were assessed for unaccounted income based on cash ledgers found during a search. The AO recorded satisfaction that the seized material related to the appellants, but the appellants argued that the seized material pertained to the partnership firm M/s Pothys and not to them. The Tribunal found that the seized material did not relate to the appellants and that the satisfaction note was based on incorrect assumptions.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the satisfaction note was validly recorded by the AO?
- 2. Whether the additions made under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act were permissible?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
ITA No. 1061/DEL/2026
Shayam Gupta vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19 to 2021-22Partly AllowedSachin Vs. DCIT
Sh. Sudesh Gahlot vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2016-17AllowedShri Suresh Chand Gupta Vs. The Dy.C.I.T
Delhi ‘G’ Bench benchAY 2020-21Partly AllowedR. Viswanathan v. The DCIT, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai