Skip to main content

Sachin Vs. DCIT

Case No: ITA Nos. 2613 & 2614/Del/2022
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
Date: 3/5/2025

Parties Involved

AppellantSachin
RespondentDCIT

Facts Summary

The assessee, Sachin, proprietor of M/s Meru Jewels, filed his return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 17,37,170/-. A search and seizure operation was conducted under section 132 of the Income Tax Act on 05.01.2017 in the case of Jindal Bullion Ltd (JBL). Digital data stored in software called 'Hajir Johri' was seized from the residence of Mr. Kushagra Jindal, promoter of JBL. The software purportedly contained parallel books maintained by JBL where both transactions through the banking

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Validity of proceedings initiated under section 153C of the Act.
  • 2. Whether the seized ledger 'Pankaj kb' pertains to the assessee.

1 more legal issue analysed in this judgement.

Precedents Relied Upon

6 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Sachin Vs. DCIT - Opakhya | Opakhya