RBL Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

RBL Bank Ltd. filed an appeal against the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty was imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the penalty was imposed without application of mind and that the assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The assessee claimed that the premium paid for acquiring the business of Royal Bank of Scotland was treated as revenue expenditure and not capital expenditure. The assessee also argued that the penalty was imposed without considering the submissions made by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had failed to demonstrate that the assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of income and dismissed the appeal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Penalty imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income
• 2. Revised return filed after notice u/s.143(2)
• 3. Inaccurate particulars of income

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Similar Judgements

• ACIT vs. Mangalam Cement Limited

  Jaipur bench

• C & S Electric Limited vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre

  Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• Shree Krishna Vanaspati Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-23(3), New Delhi

  Delhi Bench ‘G’ benchAY 2012-13Allowed

• BMW Industries Limited Vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(1)

  Kolkata benchAY 2012-13, 2015-16, 2016-17Allowed

• MRS. MANJU DEVI AGARWAL VS ITO,WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

  Jaipur bench

• Sanjeev Kumar vs. Central Circle-14

  Delhi bench