MRS. MANJU DEVI AGARWAL VS ITO,WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Mrs. Manju Devi Agarwal, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 11-01-2024, which upheld the penalty imposed for concealment of income under section 271(1)© of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the penalty was wrongly imposed and that the Commissioner of Appeals did not have the authority to change the nature of the penalty from concealment to furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The assessee also raised an additional ground of appeal regarding the Commissioner's authority under section 251 of the Income Tax Act.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Appeals had the authority to change the nature of the penalty from concealment to furnishing of inaccurate particulars.
• 2. Whether the penalty imposed for concealment of income was justified.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• BMW Industries Limited Vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(1)

  Kolkata benchAY 2012-13, 2015-16, 2016-17Allowed

• Sanjeev Kumar vs. Central Circle-14

  Delhi bench

• C & S Electric Limited vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre

  Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• Shree Krishna Vanaspati Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-23(3), New Delhi

  Delhi Bench ‘G’ benchAY 2012-13Allowed

• Ram Garhia Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-63(1), New Delhi

  Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2014-15Allowed

• Echo Entertainment Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer

  Kolkata bench