Skip to main content

Ram Kishan Gupta vs ITO, Ward 4(2), Jaipur

Case No: ITA No: 208/JPR/2026
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Jaipur
Date: 9/9/2026

Parties Involved

appellantRam Kishan Gupta
respondentITO, Ward 4(2), Jaipur

Facts Summary

The assessee, Ram Kishan Gupta, superannuated from his service and filed a revised return of income on 04.11.2020, declaring a total income of Rs 18,10,230. He claimed an exemption of Rs 13,81,281 under section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of the cash equivalent of leave salary received on retirement. The Assistant Director of Income Tax restricted the exemption to Rs 3,00,000 and added the balance of Rs 10,81,281, determining the total income at Rs 28,91,310. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the adjustment, holding that the assessee is eligible for the exemption to the extent of Rs 3,00,000 only.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the exemption under section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be confined to Rs 3,00,000 for the assessee?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

6 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning