Anant Chintaman Gundalwar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Chandrapur
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
Anant Chintaman Gundalwar, an assessee, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi, dated 15.01.2026, which arose from an assessment order dated 24.03.2025. The assessee challenged the denial of exemption for gratuity and leave encashment under sections 10(10)(i) and 10(10AA)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee had joined the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) on 30.09.1989 and retired from Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) with retirement benefits including gratuity and leave encashment. The Assessing Officer restricted the exemption for gratuity and leave encashment, which the assessee contested.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption for gratuity and leave encashment under sections 10(10)(i) and 10(10AA)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Shri Dinesh Kumar Tyagi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi benchSRINIVASA MOHAN TUMATI Vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 42(3)(1), MUMBAI
Mumbai benchM/s JSW Steel Coated Products Limited vs DCIT Circle- 5(2) (1), Mumbai
Ram Kishan Gupta vs ITO, Ward 4(2), Jaipur
Jaipur benchSabbirahmed Basirahmed Shaikh vs. ITO, Ward-4(1)(7) Vadodara
Ahmedabad benchSunil Kumar Saxena Vs CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi
Delhi Bench benchAY 2020-21Allowed