Ram Dayal vs. Dy. Director of Income Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee filed a return of income showing income of Rs.4,96,160/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, resulting in a demand of Rs.11,430/-. The assessee appealed against this order, which was dismissed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, arguing that the Central Processing Centre (CPC) wrongly reduced the TDS Credit and that the CPC lacked jurisdiction to do so under section 143(1)(a). The assessee also claimed that the CPC did not specify under which section the TDS Credit was mismatched and to what extent.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the order passed by the learned authorities below is against Law-Equity-Justice & facts of the case.
• 2. Whether the CPC wrongly reduced TDS Credit for alleged mismatch of income offered against TDS Credit claimed.
• 3. Whether the CPC erred in TDS Credit without any valid basis and without considering the nature of business of the appellant.
• 4. Whether the CPC failed to specify under which section the TDS Credit is mismatched and to what extent.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Siddapura Taluka Agricultural Produces Co-op. Marketing Society Ltd. vs. ITO

  Bangalore benchAY 2022-23Allowed

• Kamlesh Kumar Jain vs DCIT, Circle-2, Kota

  Jaipur bench

• The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Circle – 1, Bengaluru. Vs. M/s. Infosys Employee Benefits Trust

  'A' Bench : Bangalore benchAY 2021-22Dismissed

• Abhishek Kanoria vs Income Tax Officer

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2021-2022Allowed

• Pravin Kumar Nagpal vs. Income Tax Officer

  Jodhpur bench

• Sikha Rani De Vs. I.T.O., Ward-3(1), Bankura

  Kolkata 'SMC' Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed