Pravin Kumar Nagpal vs. Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Pravin Kumar Nagpal, working as a commission agent, filed a return of income for the Assessment Year 2022-23. The Central Processing Centre (CPC) processed the return under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, allowing partial credit of the total tax deducted at source (TDS) claimed by the assessee. The CPC disallowed the claim of Rs.8,61,601/- out of Rs.9,40,670/- claimed as TDS, citing Rule 37BA of the Act. The assessee appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 15/12/2023, arguing that the CPC and the Commissioner erred in not allowing the TDS credit.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the appeal order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai is bad in law, illegal, and against facts.
• 2. Whether the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai erred in not allowing credit of TDS claimed under section 194Q of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the wrong interpretation of law and facts.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Kamlesh Kumar Jain vs DCIT, Circle-2, Kota

  Jaipur bench

• Rameshkumar Veljibhai Patel Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (A) – 8 Mumbai

  Mumbai bench

• The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Circle – 1, Bengaluru. Vs. M/s. Infosys Employee Benefits Trust

  'A' Bench : Bangalore benchAY 2021-22Dismissed

• MAI E-Travel Services Private Limited vs. Dy. Director

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2023-24Allowed

• M/s. Immaculate Heart of Mary Hospital vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

  Cochin bench

• Sujit Kumar Deb Vs. Income Tax Officer 42(1)(5)

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2013-14Allowed