PPAP Automotive Limited vs. DCIT

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee company, PPAP Automotive Limited, is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of PVC Profiles. The company entered into an agreement with Japanese firms to procure technical assistance and was required to make royalty payments at an agreed percentage of net sales price. The Assessing Officer disallowed 25% of the royalty payment, treating it as capital expenditure. The assessee appealed against this disallowance, arguing that the entire royalty payment should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal had previously ruled in favor of the assessee in similar cases for assessment years 2005-06 to 2012-13.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Disallowance of royalty payment as capital expenditure
• 2. Consistency with previous rulings

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 2(1), Bangalore Vs. Chaitanya Properties Pvt. Ltd.

  'A' Bench, Bangalore benchAY 2011-12Dismissed

• Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai

  Chennai bench

• TAG Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle - 1(1) Trivandrum

  Cochin bench

• Denso Haryana Pvt Ltd Vs. The Dy.CI.T.

  Delhi ‘I’ Bench benchAY 2011-12, 2012-13Partly Allowed

• nVent Thermal India Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• M/s. The Government Tele Communication Employees Co-operative Society Limited Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 11(1), Chennai