Skip to main content

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai

Case No: ITA Nos. 1735, 1736, 1737, 1738, 1739 & 1740/Chny/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai
Date: 9/11/2024

Parties Involved

RespondentDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4) Chennai
AppellantDhivaharan Jeyanandh

Facts Summary

In all the above appeals for assessment years 2013-14 to 2018-19, the Revenue contested the orders of the Ld. CIT(A) whereby the order passed under section 143(3) read with section 263 was deleted by the Ld. First Appellate Authority through his common order dated 16.04.2024. The order under section 143(3) read with section 153(C) was passed on 31.12.2019 after making additions of Rs.25.47 Lakhs on account of cash deposits. The assessment was passed pursuant to a search under section 132 on 09.11.2017, upon the assesse’s father. The Ld. PCIT invoked revisionary proceedings under section 263 on the premise that investment in luxury cars was made by the assesse through the impugned cash deposits of Rs.25.47 Lakhs. The assesse challenged the revisionary proceedings before this tribunal, and consequently, the order of the Ld. PCIT dated 11.03.2021 was quashed by the Coordinate Bench of this tribunal in ITA Nos. 158/Chny/2021 to 164/Chny/2021, all dated 22.12.2022, for assessment years 2012-13 to 2018-19 respectively. The Ld. AO proceeded to pass orders under section 143(3) read with section 263 for assessment years 2013-14 to 2018-19 all dated 31.03.2022 by ignoring the assesse’s request for keeping the proceedings in abeyance on account of its appeal challenging action under section 263 pending before this tribunal. The Ld. First Appellate Authority held the view in his order dated 16.04.2024 that post the order of this Hon’ble Tribunal dated 22.12.2022, the order of the Ld. AO

Decision in favour of

Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the assessment order passed by the Ld. AO is void ab initio and cannot stand any test of judicial scrutiny?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

1 precedent cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning