Mohanlal Premraj Shah vs. Income Tax Officer-Ward-5
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Mohanlal Premraj Shah, is engaged in the trading business of firecrackers. For the Assessment Year 2020-21, he filed a return declaring a total income of Rs. 17,25,580/-. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) received information from the Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation) stating that incriminating documents were found during a search and survey conducted on 'M/s Ambica Fireworks Group' and 'M/s Ambica Ashish Trade Link LLP'. Based on this information, the ITO believed that the assessee had made unaccounted purchases in cash, leading to an addition of Rs. 6,77,770/- under section 69C and a further addition of Rs. 1,75,407/- as estimated profit on the unaccounted purchases. The assessee filed an appeal against this order, which was dismissed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals). The assessee then approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the ITO was justified in making the addition of Rs. 6,77,770/- under section 69C on account of unexplained purchase transactions.
- 2. Whether the ITO was justified in making the addition of Rs. 1,75,407/- as estimated profit on the unaccounted purchases.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee.
Similar Judgements
DCIT, Central Circle-2, Madurai vs. Sitaram Jewellers
Shah Petroleum Products Vs. ACIT, Circle 27(3)
Mumbai Bench 'F' benchAY 2012-13AllowedITA No.6546/M/2024, ITA No.6549/M/2024, ITA No.6779/M/2024
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12Partly AllowedITA Nos. 1879/KOL/2025 (A.Y. 2018-2019) & ITA Nos. 1880/KOL/2025 (A.Y. 2019-2020)
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-2019, 2019-2020DismissedThe ACIT, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai. v. M/s. EI Instrumentation – Pvt. Ltd.
Shri Parasnath Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-2, Muzaffarnagar
Delhi Benches “F”, New Delhi benchAY 2012-13Allowed