DCIT, Central Circle-2, Madurai vs. Sitaram Jewellers

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Sitaram Jewellers, is a firm engaged in the business of purchasing and selling gold ornaments. The case arises from the findings of a search conducted under section 132 of the Income Tax Act at the premises of M/s. Mohanlal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. (MJPL) and others. During the search, incriminating documents and a ledger named 'Sitaram Sir MD' were found, indicating unaccounted transactions between the assessee and MJPL. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions to the assessee's income for unaccounted business income and unexplained expenditure based on these findings. The assessee appealed these additions before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), who partly allowed the appeal by restricting the addition to 2% gross profit on unaccounted purchases and deleting the additions for unexplained expenditure.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in restricting the addition of unaccounted purchases to 2% gross profit.
• 2. Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions made under section 69C for unexplained expenditure.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Punit Jain vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 51(5)

  Delhi Bench 'F', Delhi benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Nissim Traders Private Limited vs DCIT, Circle 2(3)(1), Mumbai

  SMC BENCH, MUMBAI benchAY 2018-19Dismissed

• ITA Nos. 1879/KOL/2025 (A.Y. 2018-2019) & ITA Nos. 1880/KOL/2025 (A.Y. 2019-2020)

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-2019, 2019-2020Dismissed

• ITA No.3988/Mum/2025

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2021-22Dismissed

• Amar Kumar Agarwal vs DCIT, CC 4(3)

  Kolkata benchAY 2017-18 to 2021-22Partly Allowed

• The Dy. C.I.T Vs. M/s Kurele Packaging Pvt Ltd