Janakbhai Babubhai Desai Vs. The ITO, Ward -1, Bardoli
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee filed his return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 on 09.02.2018, declaring a total income of Rs.12,46,991/-. The assessee's case was selected for complete scrutiny. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) issued various notices, to which the assessee did not comply. The AO completed the assessment under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on 14.12.2019, making four additions: (i) Rs.45,42,593/- under section 68 for unexplained credits, (ii) Rs.15,25,651/- for unexplained cash deposits, (iii) Rs.1,13,392/- for disallowance of expenditure, and (iv) Rs.64,49,950/- for undisclosed income. The AO finalized the total income at Rs.1,38,78,580/-. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), who sustained certain additions and deleted others. Both the revenue and the assessee filed appeals before the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in restricting the addition of Rs. 45,42,593/- to Rs. 16,18,593/- made on account of unexplained credits under section 68 of the Act.
- 2. Whether the CIT(A) erred in restricting the addition of Rs. 15,25,651/- to Rs. 2,78,660/- made on account of unexplained cash deposits under section 68 of the Act.
- 3. Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer without having any documentary evidences or additional evidences submitted by the assessee during the appellate proceedings.
- 4. Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 64,49,950/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of undisclosed income.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
2 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
DCIT, Central Circle-2, Madurai vs. Sitaram Jewellers
Narmada Commodities Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-6(3)
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2010-11 & 2011-12Partly AllowedThe Dy. C.I.T Vs. M/s Kurele Packaging Pvt Ltd
M/s. Zen Tradex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT
Delhi benchIncome Tax Officer, Ward-20(1), New Delhi vs. M/s. Precision Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi Bench benchAY 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03Partly AllowedITA No.1027/Mum/2025
"F" BENCH MUMBAI benchAY 2014-15Dismissed