Skip to main content

Janakbhai Babubhai Desai Vs. The ITO, Ward -1, Bardoli

Case No: ITA No.460/SRT/2023 & Co.19/SRT/2023
Court: Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Surat Bench, Surat
Date: 9/19/2024

Parties Involved

AppellantJanakbhai Babubhai Desai
RespondentThe ITO, Ward -1, Bardoli

Facts Summary

The assessee filed his return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 on 09.02.2018, declaring a total income of Rs.12,46,991/-. The assessee's case was selected for complete scrutiny. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) issued various notices, to which the assessee did not comply. The AO completed the assessment under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on 14.12.2019, making four additions: (i) Rs.45,42,593/- under section 68 for unexplained credits, (ii) Rs.15,25,651/- for unexplained cash deposits, (iii) Rs.1,13,392/- for disallowance of expenditure, and (iv) Rs.64,49,950/- for undisclosed income. The AO finalized the total income at Rs.1,38,78,580/-. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), who sustained certain additions and deleted others. Both the revenue and the assessee filed appeals before the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in restricting the addition of Rs. 45,42,593/- to Rs. 16,18,593/- made on account of unexplained credits under section 68 of the Act.
  • 2. Whether the CIT(A) erred in restricting the addition of Rs. 15,25,651/- to Rs. 2,78,660/- made on account of unexplained cash deposits under section 68 of the Act.
  • 3. Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer without having any documentary evidences or additional evidences submitted by the assessee during the appellate proceedings.
  • 4. Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 64,49,950/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of undisclosed income.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning