M/s. Unitech Acacia Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The appellant, M/s. Unitech Acacia Projects Pvt. Ltd., acquired land from NOIDA and paid lease rent without deducting TDS, based on NOIDA's advice that its income was exempt under section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer held the appellant liable to deduct TDS and imposed interest liability under section 201(1A). The appellant appealed, arguing that NOIDA's income was exempt and thus no TDS was required. The Revenue cross-appealed, challenging the exemption claim. Additionally, the appellant in ITA No. 7798/Del/2018 contested the disallowance of interest expenses under section 40(a)(ia) due to late TDS deduction.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the appellant was liable to deduct TDS under section 194-I while making payments to NOIDA, GNOIDA, and YEIDA.
- 2. Whether the interest liability under section 201(1A) was correctly imposed.
- 3. Whether the Revenue's appeal regarding the exemption under section 10(20A) was valid.
- 4. Whether the disallowance of interest expenses under section 40(a)(ia) was correctly imposed.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
6 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
The Haryana State Cooperative Labour & Construction Federation Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer(TDS)
Accounts Officer, BSNL vs DCIT, TDS, Noida
Delhi Bench benchAY 2008-09Partly AllowedM/s. SOCOMEC India Pvt. Ltd vs. Dy. CIT, TDS Circle, Gurgaon
Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19AllowedEmaar India Limited Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi benchAY 2015-16AllowedEminence Township (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT(TDS)
Delhi Bench benchAY 2015-16AllowedKad Steel Rolling Mills vs. Income Tax Officer
Ahmedabad bench