Eminence Township (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT(TDS)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Eminence Township (India) Pvt. Ltd, is a builder that made payments of Rs. 70 lakhs towards External Development Charges (EDC) to Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) on 29-12-2014, relevant to assessment year 2015-16. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, show-causing the assessee for non-deduction of TDS on EDC payments made to HUDA and levied interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act. The AO applied Section 194I of the Act, charging a 10% TDS rate. However, the Delhi High Court in the case of Puri Construction Pvt Ltd vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax held that EDC payments should be covered under Section 194C of the Act, which mandates a 2% TDS rate. Consequently, the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) sought to revise the AO's order, which the assessee appealed against.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, passed by the CIT(TDS) is without jurisdiction, bad in law, and void-ab-initio.
• 2. Whether the CIT(TDS) erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act.
• 3. Whether the CIT(TDS) erred in exercising revisionary jurisdiction by not appreciating that EDC were paid consequent to a license granted by DTCP, Government of Haryana, and there was no contractual obligation between the assessee and HUDA.
• 4. Whether the CIT(TDS) erred in exercising revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act ignoring the provisions of clause (c) of Explanation 1 to Section 263 of the Act.
• 5. Whether the CIT(TDS) erred in exercising jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act because the AO passed an order computing a higher amount of TDS.
• 6. Whether the CIT(TDS) erred in exercising jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act in respect of the issue of liability of the assessee to deduct TDS on EDC Payments to HUDA.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Tarang Infra Projects Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• Emaar India Limited Vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• M/s Base Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-73(3), New Delhi-110092

  Delhi Bench ‘E’, New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Dismissed

• Kad Steel Rolling Mills vs. Income Tax Officer

  Ahmedabad bench

• ALI FAZAL Vs. Income Tax Officer TDS Ward

  Mumbai benchAY 2020-21Partly Allowed

• DCIT (TDS)-2(3), Mumbai Vs. Tata Play Limited

  Mumbai benchAY 2016-17Dismissed