Govind Kumar Goyal vs. ITO
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessment for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in the case of the assessee was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act, 1961 on 19/08/2015 at an assessed income of Rs.11,50,900/- by the Assessing Officer as against the return of income of Rs.9,33,130/-. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act. The assessment order came to be passed on 27/09/2018 u/s 147/143(3) of the Act by making addition of Rs.26,490/- by disallowing expenses for tuition fee and further disallowed Rs.1,60,271/- on the ground that assessee could not produce the voucher of expenses for the plant and machinery. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 27/09/2018, assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 17/05/2023, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. As against the order dated 17/05/2023 passed by the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee preferred the present appeal before this Tribunal on the grounds mentioned above.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified to sustain invocation of proceedings u/s 147?
- 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified to uphold the propriety of assessment?
- 3. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified in sustaining addition of Rs.26490/- wrongly described Tuition Expenses?
- 4. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified in sustaining addition of Rs. 160271 for depreciation and additional depreciation?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Suresh Kumar Gupta Vs. ACIT
Delhi Bench ‘G’ New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Partly AllowedShruti Lal Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2020-21AllowedMoti Lal vs. Income Tax Officer
Jodhpur benchRajbir Singh (2013-14)
B Bench, Delhi benchAY 2013-14DismissedDCIT Vs. Sterling Agro Industries Ltd.
Delhi Bench ‘B’ benchAY 2020-21DismissedPERIYA AGOUNDER RAMASAMY v. ITO Ward-1(6), SALEM