Skip to main content

PERIYA AGOUNDER RAMASAMY v. ITO Ward-1(6), SALEM

Case No: ITA Nos. 3309 & 3311/Chny/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Date: 1/27/2026

Parties Involved

appellantPERIYA AGOUNDER RAMASAMY
respondentITO Ward-1(6), SALEM

Facts Summary

The Appellant initially did not file his Return of Income. The case of the Appellant was reopened on the information that the Appellant had made cash deposits into various bank accounts during the impugned period. Notice u/s.148 were issued on 31/03/2023. In response to the Notice, the Appellant had duly filed his Return of Income on 14/04/2023 declaring an income of Rs.2,59,730/-. Notices u/s.142(1) were also issued on 21/08/2023, 24/11/2023 and 23/01/2024 and Notice u/s. 143(2) was issued on 0

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Delay of 203 days in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A).
  • 2. Dismissal of the appeal by the Ld. CIT(A) without adjudicating the issues on merits.

Precedents Relied Upon

1 precedent cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
PERIYA AGOUNDER RAMASAMY v. ITO Ward-1(6), SALEM - Opakhya | Opakhya