Gita M Shah Vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The appellant, Gita M Shah, filed her income tax return for the assessment year 2013-14 declaring a total income of Rs. 17,87,780/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and issued a notice on 28.07.2022. The AO made additions to the appellant's income, including a long-term capital gain of Rs. 2,96,53,989/- and commission expenses of Rs. 5,93,080/-. The appellant filed an appeal against the assessment order, which was dismissed ex-parte by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) for non-prosecution. The appellant then filed this appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), raising several grounds of challenge against the reassessment proceedings and the assessment order.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Validity of the order passed under section 147 read with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
- 2. Failure to provide a copy of the approval obtained under section 151 of the Act.
- 3. Treatment of income exempt under section 10(38) of the Act as taxable income.
- 4. Reliance on the investigation wing's report without rebutting the appellant's evidence.
- 5. Addition of long-term capital gain as income under section 68 of the Act.
- 6. Addition of commission expenses under section 69C of the Act.
3 further legal issues analysed in the full judgement.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
6 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Neena Bihani Vs. ITO Ward 49(2)
Kolkata benchAY 2015-16AllowedMr. Jay Hansraj Chheda Vs. Income Tax Officer
Surendra Garg, HUF vs Income Tax Officer 19(3)(4), Mumbai
Anju Kesarwani Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi Bench benchAY 2014-15AllowedVipul Mittal vs. DCIT, Circle 11 (2)
Gaurav Dye House Vs. ITO
Delhi 'E' Bench benchAY 2022-23Allowed