Anju Kesarwani Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee sold 4,000 shares of PMC Fincorp Ltd. and declared Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) of Rs. 8,59,559/-. The STCG was duly disclosed in the return of income. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act accepting the returned income. The assessment was reopened on the ground that the assessee had allegedly taken bogus entries in the garb of Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of shares. The assessee had in fact earned STCG, which was duly offered to tax.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Validity of reopening of assessment
- 2. Confirmation of addition of Rs. 27,20,000/- u/s. 68
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Sandstone Investment Partners I Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax- (IT)
Delhi Bench 'D', Delhi benchAY 2017-18AllowedAlka Ashok Jagtap Vs. Income Tax Office
Mumbai benchAY 2009-10AllowedKalpana Nitin Shah Vs. ITO 19(2)(2)
SMC Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2011-12Partly AllowedSterling Finvst Private ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-5(1)
Kolkata benchAY 2014-15AllowedIncome Tax Officer vs. Harsha Asheshbhai Patel
Ahmedabad benchPooja Babulal Jain Vs ITO, Ward-23(2)(6), Mumbai