Florence Agro Farms vs. ITO Ward 23(1)(6)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Florence Agro Farms, a partnership firm, owned agricultural land in Nasik district of Maharashtra. The firm filed returns for the years 2015-16 and 2016-17 declaring total income at rupees nil. The firm claimed income from agricultural products amounting to ₹40,34,970/- and claimed deduction under section 10(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The returns were selected for scrutiny assessment, and the Assessing Officer issued notices and recorded statements from parties who denied purchasing agricultural products from the firm. The Assessing Officer treated the sum as unexplained cash credit, taxable under section 68 of the Act. The firm appealed to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) who upheld the Assessing Officer's findings. The firm further appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. The Learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs.40,34,970/- under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
• 2. The Learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the sale of agricultural produce credited in the books of accounts was not genuine.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Chunakhali Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. Vs. I.T.O., Ward-56(3), Murshidabad

  Kolkata 'SMC' Bench benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Shri. Neelakanth Kuntoji Basavaraj vs. ITO

  Bangalore bench

• K 1104 Elayamuthur Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society v. Income Tax Officer

  Chennai bench

• ITA No. 6577/Del/2025 (A.Y 2017) ACIT Vs. Pushpa Aggarwal

  Delhi bench

• Sh. Madan Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(5), Faridabad

• STAR AGRO FARMS VS. ITO, WARD 4

  DELHI BENCH ‘G’’ : NEW DELHI benchAY 2012-13Allowed