K 1104 Elayamuthur Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society v. Income Tax Officer
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, K 1104 Elayamuthur Primary Agricultural Co-Op Credit Society, filed returns for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18, claiming deductions under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The returns were processed, and the cases were selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer issued notices to the assessee, who submitted relevant details. The AO framed an assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, disallowing the entire deduction claimed under Section 80P. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who allowed some deductions but confirmed the disallowance of certain deductions. The assessee further appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is erroneous in law.
- 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not considering the submissions made by the appellant.
- 3. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in deciding that the appellant is not entitled for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).
- 4. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not following the decision of the jurisdictional High Court.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
4 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Sterling Court F Wing Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-31(2)(1)
SMC Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15AllowedLunawada Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. vs The ITO, Ward-1, Lunawada
Ahmedabad benchMahalaxmi Jagdamba Nagrik Gramin Credit Cooperative Society vs. Income Tax Officer
Nagpur benchITA No.1384/Chny/2024 (AY 2018-19) M/s.SSP Aranuthumalai Hill Tribes Lamp Co.op. Society Ltd.
Chennai benchBhagwan Shree Agrasen Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit vs. Income Tax Officer
Pune benchM/s. More Mauli Co-op Credit Society Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2)(1), Mumbai