Skip to main content

DY. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3( 4) vs. Samagra Wealthmax Private Limited

Case No: ITA No. 2165/M UM/2023
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Date: 8 Oct 2024

Parties Involved

appellantDY. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3( 4)
respondentSamagra Wealthmax Private Limited

Facts Summary

Samagra Wealthmax Private Limited, a real estate company, was assessed for the year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer added Rs. 149.29 crores to the assessee's income, considering it as income from other sources or business income. The assessee appealed against this addition, arguing that the reserve was capital in nature and not taxable. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the addition, and the Assessing Officer appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, finding that the reserve was capital in nature and not taxable under the Income Tax Act.…

Decision in favour of

Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the capital reserve of Rs. 149.29 crores generated on account of amalgamation is taxable under section 28(iv) of the Act.
  • 2. Whether the capital reserve credited in the balance sheet of the assessee company is capital in nature.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

3 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1•Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning