Subhash E. Dhargave Vs. Milestone Real Estate Funds
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Milestone Real Estate Funds, a venture capital fund, filed an income return for the Assessment Year 2016-17 declaring an income of Rs. 19,23,29,278/-. The Assessing Officer denied the benefit claimed by the assessee under sections 10(23FB) and 10(35) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the exemption in favor of the assessee, which the Revenue is now appealing against. The assessee argued that it was entitled to the exemptions based on previous decisions of the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, finding that the assessee qualified as a Venture Capital Fund under SEBI regulations and that its investments in the real estate sector were not in violation of the relevant provisions.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. CIT(A) deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer and allowing the exemption of Rs. 1,33,09,44,019/-, u/s 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- 2. CIT(A) allowing the exemption u/s 10(35) of the Act amounting to Rs. 3,62,17,856/-, earned from distribution from units held in mutual funds.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
2 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
LICHFL Fund Vs. ITO Ward 23(2)(1)
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 23(1), Mumbai Vs. Milestone Real Estate Fund
Mumbai benchSouth Asian Regional Apex Fund Vs. Income Tax Officer – 19(3)(4), Mumbai
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2010-11 and 2012-13AllowedSiddhartha Lal Trust vs DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi benchAY 2018-19AllowedMax Square Ltd. vs ITO
Delhi 'G' Bench benchAY 2021-22DismissedITA No.2440&2441/Bang/2024
'A' Bench, Bangalore benchAY 2018-19 & 2019-20Allowed