Computility India Private Limited vs ITO, Ward-6(2)(1), Mumbai

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was finalized on 29.12.2017 for the assessee, Computility India Private Limited. The assessing officer made a disallowance of interest expenses of Rs. 18,39,295/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of tax in respect of interest payment made to M/s. Religare Finvest Ltd. The assessee submitted that the repayment of the loan was made to the company by equated monthly installments and on the instruction of the company, the assessee had not deducted tax at source on the said interest payment as the company had offered the said interest income for taxation and paid tax thereon. The assessing officer did not agree with the submission of the assessee and made a disallowance of the aforesaid amount of interest payment. The assessing officer also disallowed the claim of prior period expenses of Rs. 1,26,83,205/-. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal), but did not comply with the notices issued for hearing and requested for adjournment. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) rejected the request of the assessee repeatedly and sustained the disallowance made by the assessing officer. The assessee appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench 'C'.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in passing an ex parte order without providing sufficient opportunity to explain the facts of the case?
• 2. Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appellant's appeal in limine without consideration of the subject issues on merit?
• 3. Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in upholding addition of Rs. 18,39,295/- made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act, 1961 by the Ld AO to the returned income by disallowing legitimate interest expenses claimed without assigning valid reason?
• 4. Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in upholding addition of Rs. 1,26,83,205/- made to the returned income by the Ld AO by disallowing prior period expenses claimed without assigning valid reason?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• The Advertising Corporation of India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle-4(2), Kolkata

  SMC Bench Kolkata benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Subhashish Chatterjee vs. ITO, Ward 28(3)

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2019-20Allowed

• Vijay Kumar Mahawar vs. ACIT/DCIT

  Jodhpur bench

• M/s. SPL Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

  'B' Bench : Bangalore benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• M/s. SOCOMEC India Pvt. Ltd vs. Dy. CIT, TDS Circle, Gurgaon

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• M/S. SMART EYE SECURITY SYSTEM Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

  Delhi bench