Skip to main content

Subhashish Chatterjee vs. ITO, Ward 28(3)

Case No: ITA No.1923/Del/2024
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’’ : NEW DELHI)
Date: 2/19/2025

Parties Involved

appellantSubhashish Chatterjee
respondentITO, Ward 28(3)

Facts Summary

This appeal by the assessee, Subhashish Chatterjee, emanates from the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)-13, Mumbai in Appeal No. CIT(A), Delhi – 10/10092/2020-21 dated 05.03.2024. The assessment/process of return was made by the CPC, Bangalore under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2019-20 vide order dated 07.07.2020. The assessee paid car hire charges to Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Proprietor of M/s Andaman Adventure and Tour Planners, and other expenses for sightseeing of guests. The CPC, Bangalore disallowed the expenses amounting to Rs. 9,98,920/- for non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee claimed that the payment was made at Rs. 33,29,707/- and the recipient has declared the receipts in his return of income, hence, no disallowance should be made.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Disallowance of car hire charges and other expenses for non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning