Subhashish Chatterjee vs. ITO, Ward 28(3)
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
This appeal by the assessee, Subhashish Chatterjee, emanates from the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)-13, Mumbai in Appeal No. CIT(A), Delhi – 10/10092/2020-21 dated 05.03.2024. The assessment/process of return was made by the CPC, Bangalore under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2019-20 vide order dated 07.07.2020. The assessee paid car hire charges to Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Proprietor of M/s Andaman Adventure and Tour Planners, and other expenses for sightseeing of guests. The CPC, Bangalore disallowed the expenses amounting to Rs. 9,98,920/- for non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee claimed that the payment was made at Rs. 33,29,707/- and the recipient has declared the receipts in his return of income, hence, no disallowance should be made.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Disallowance of car hire charges and other expenses for non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
2 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Bikash Kumar Mondal
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2010-2011Partly AllowedDeliverhealth Services Private Limited vs. DCIT, Circle 7 (1), Delhi
Delhi Bench benchAY 2021-22AllowedM/s. Unitech Acacia Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
Delhi benchHero Fincop Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-11(1)
M/s. Centrix Technologies Private Limited vs. ITO-Circle 1(2)(1), Mumbai
Mumbai 'C' Bench benchAY 2013-14AllowedM/s. SOCOMEC India Pvt. Ltd vs. Dy. CIT, TDS Circle, Gurgaon
Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed