Berger Becker Coatings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
An assessment order was passed on 30/10/2023 under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(3) r.w. Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by computing the income of the Assessee at Rs. 32,67,53,450/- as against the returned income of Rs. 16,93,03,680/-. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 30/10/2023, the Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 02/01/2025, dismissed the Appeal filed by the Assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 02/01/2025, Assessee preferred the present Appeal. The Assessee filed an application for condoning the delay of 73 days in filing the present Appeal, stating that the order was passed ex-parte and the Assessee company did not receive any intimation regarding the pronouncement of the order.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Delay of 73 days in filing the present Appeal.
- 2. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) provided an opportunity of being heard to the Assessee and decided all grounds of Appeal on its merits.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Geon International Pvt Ltd Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench “B”: New Delhi benchAY 2015-16 & 2016-17Partly AllowedTriumph Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO
Delhi Bench ‘G’ New Delhi benchAY 2018-19Partly AllowedLokeshSachdeva Vs. DCIT
DELHI BENCH ‘E’ NEW DELHI benchAY 2015-16DismissedMadhu Devi Saraf Educational Trust Vs DCIT, Central Circle-3(3), Kolkata
Kolkata benchAY 2023-2024Partly AllowedPERIYA AGOUNDER RAMASAMY v. ITO Ward-1(6), SALEM
Sunil Bhagat Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1), Gangtok
Kolkata benchAY 2018-19Allowed