Skip to main content

Archana Hitesh Somani Vs. Income Tax Officer

Case No: ITA No. 2169/AHD/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad
Date: 9/10/2026

Parties Involved

appellantArchana Hitesh Somani
respondentIncome Tax Officer, Ward – 1(2)(2), Baroda

Facts Summary

The assessee, Archana Hitesh Somani, had filed her return of income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 30.07.2012 declaring income of Rs. 4,85,290/-. The case was reopened on the basis of information that the assessee, as a co-owner, had sold a property for a consideration of Rs. 8.10 crores, the stamp duty value of which was Rs. 27,17,57,000/-. The assessment was completed on 29.12.2016 at a total income of Rs. 5,06,32,250/-, with additions of Rs. 4,88,67,000/- under section 50C for long-term capital gains (LTCG) and Rs. 12,76,120/- under section 50C for short-term capital gains (STCG) on the sale of shops. The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which was partly allowed. The assessee then filed a second appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Validity of issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act without complying with the requirements mandated for issuing notice under section 148 by the Statute.
  • 2. Assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 by the Assessing Officer by issuing notice under section 148 as there was no escapement of income within the meaning of section 147 and related conditions specified in the Act had not been satisfied at all.
  • 3. Upholding the addition of Rs. 8,48,621/- under section 50C made by the Assessing Officer without taking into account the explanations and submissions of the appellant made in the course of assessment as well as in appellate proceedings.
  • 4. Not quashing the re-assessment order made under section 147 of the Act even though the addition made on the basis of reasons recorded for reopening has already been deleted and not challenged before the Hon'ble Tribunal.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning