Alok Kumar vs. Income Tax Officer
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Alok Kumar, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 13th September 2022 for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessee contested the addition of Rs.42,39,000/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 144 read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had determined the full value of the property based on the Stamp Duty Valuation Authorities' valuation, which was higher than the sale consideration declared in the sale deed. The Tribunal decided to adjudicate only on the issue of the sustainability of the addition.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the addition of Rs.42,39,000/- made by the Assessing Officer is sustainable?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Similar Judgements
Bhushan Vasant Parelkar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 41(2)(1), Mumbai
Sh. Vijay Rai Marwaha Vs. ACIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2020-21Partly AllowedMrs. Geeta Narendra Gandhi Vs. ITO Ward 19(1)(1), Mumbai
SMC Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2019-20Partly AllowedMita Haldar vs. ITO, Ward 42(1), Murshidabad
Kolkata benchAero Pack Products Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer
Debasish Banerjee vs. ITO, Ward-44(1), Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed